konsolebox

Obvious pros and cons regarding this concept: + far less predictable + far less crackable + very flexible + could be a candidate as a good encryption system to protect against new superfast computing systems - not easy or less easier to implement esp. in embedded systems - the stronger and the more random the implementation, the slower and the more difficult to stabilize and/or optimize - very matrical and mind squeezing esp. when making the code extremely solid and consistent For the past few years I've been wondering why encryption systems, even though have already been considered as stable on the time they were released or known to the public, mostly were still breakable either through the use of fast computing systems or through some ingeneous tricks. Then last year I thought that if the inventors of encryption systems can never be sure or can never solidize their systems, then perhaps those systems should be encrypted as well. What I mean here is that, we can perhaps cre